|
Museum Review |
Court Barn.
Drawing by R. Harris.
Crawley Hall
This important
project has suffered some delays, partly caused by difficulties in
settling details of its conversion and partly by bad weather.
Work is now in
progress, in earnest, and it is expected that construction work will be
ready for the beginning of the new season.
As reported earlier,
the building is to be used to provide a library and seminar room so
therefore modern requirements have had to be met. A use of this kind also
involves us in building regulations imposing very different problems for
the Museum than those previously encountered in normal exhibit buildings.
Some modification has been made to the original treatment of the exterior
of the building. Greater use of tile hanging will be made.
It should also be
noted that the ends of the building are not intended to be visible from
any great distance. The next two buildings to be erected in the market
area – the Horsham Shop and a hall house from Bexley - will effectively
mask these ends.
The work programme
for the next two years includes the re-erection of both these buildings,
thus completing one side of the market square. The finished result should
be a most attractive scene but one which avoids a sham reconstruction
- the alternative to the policy followed in the present project.
Lavant House
The reconstruction
of this brick building is now under way. Once again, it is a
service building and, as the surviving material was very limited,
the only way of rebuilding the structure was to use modern materials on
the inner skin and the original bricks, mixed with replacement, on the
exterior. The inner space will be converted to the Museum Shop, a much
needed improvement.
Lurgashall Mill
Once these two
service buildings are completed, it will be possible to revert to the more
usual type of work at the Museum. Indeed, we have been continuing with the
reconstruction of the Mill from Lurgashall. The roof is now complete and
work on the interior installations are about to start. Peter Stenning, a
millwright, is to undertake this work under the Monument Trust Scheme,
reported elsewhere in these pages.
Boarhunt
Cottage
We have to report
delays on this project due to the difficulty experienced in finding
suitable timbers for the roof and for the base cruck blade. These have now
been obtained and the frame is soon to be re-erected.
|
The Future
When the current buildings are completed, work will start on the re-erection
of Court Barn.
Barns are ideal buildings to use as interpretation exhibitions and it is
intended to use this building in such a way. It is to be re-erected in the
Wheelwrights Forge complex and will house an exhibition illustrating the
work of plumbers and leadworkers. This scheme is being aided by sponsorship
from the Worshipful Company of Plumbers, who approached the Museum with the
proposal. The work of plumbers and leadworkers is an important part of
building history and its illustration within the
Museum will form an important addition.
Part of the barn will also house an exhibition concerned with the conversion
of timber: it will show traditional tools and transport used in the
preparation of this basic building material. In addition, a small section
will be devoted to lime burning and brick making.
The reconstruction of the building will be reasonably quick and straight
forward. However, the exhibition is unlikely
to be open to the public until the beginning of the 1979 season.
David Russell of John Schewert and Partners (also a member of the Management
Council), has agreed to act as architect to the scheme. The contribution to
be made by the Worshipful Company of Plumbers is gratefully acknowledged.
Their enthusiasm, as well as financial help, is a major factor in the
implementation of the project.
On the completion of this building, work will start on the reconstruction of
the Horsham Shop. This will be followed by the Hall House from Bexley, known
as North Cray. The former has been reported in these pages in detail. North
Cray will be the subject of a detailed report in the next issue.
Monument Trust
The Monument Trust have agreed to support three
craftsmen for a further three years. This future
sponsorship is yet another example of the generous support given to the
Museum by the Monument trust.
Job Creation
Scheme
During the summer months, a Job Creation Scheme has been operated at the
Museum. Three craftsmen have been employed for six months. Towards the end
of the scheme only two, one carpenter and one stonemason, remained with the
scheme. They have been employed on the Lurgashall Mill and the Crawley
Hall.
Warren Cottages
The restoration of two cottages in West Dean village is now well underway.
One cottage will provide much needed accommodation for staff, a commodity
very scarce in this area. The other will eventually provide accommodation
for the growing number of people willing to spend a week or two working at
the Museum. With this facility, we hope to be able to encourage volunteers
to offer their services to the Museum.
The work involved in the restoration has largely been done by Roger Champion
and Heather Jackson (in their spare time).
|
Buildings in Store
The commitment to buildings has grown considerably
over the last few years. Below is a list of buildings in store, or on their
original site, to which the Museum is committed.
 |
Horsham Shop |
 |
Sole Street Farm
House |
 |
Little Winkhurst |
 |
Court Barn |
 |
Tindall Cottage
|
 |
Sheffield Park Saw
Pit |
 |
Wiston Wagon Shed |
 |
Ashurst Granary
|
 |
Chilcomb Granary
|
 |
Bexley Hall House |
 |
Goodwood Sheds |
To be dismantled:
 |
Netherhale Farm (not
decided) |
 |
Fountains Farm Barn |
 |
The Platt Cottage |
 |
Woking Carpenter's
Shop. |
At current prices, it is estimated that the re-erection of these buildings
will cost £220,000.
|
Visitor Attendance Figures 1977
As expected, we have seen a decline in visitors this season. The weather has
not be conducive to visiting outdoor sites. Below are the monthly figures.
|
April
|
16,437 |
|
May |
17,018 |
|
June
|
20,748 |
|
July
|
30,014 |
|
August |
44,118 |
|
Total: |
128,334 |
|
Congratulations Roger Champion and Heather Jackson
Roger Champion, our master craftsman, and Heather Jackson, education officer
at the Museum, were married in the autumn.
Roger was the first member of the Museum staff. Many of you will know of the
contribution that he has made to the standard of craftsmanship at the Museum
and in many other ways. Heather has developed the education service, with
confidence, until it is now making an important contribution to educational
services in the area.
I
am sure that, as a team, they will achieve even more.
I
know that Friends will want to join me in wishing them every happiness. |
New Format Newsletter
Members may be surprised by the new format of this Newsletter. The
production of over 1300 newsletters, using a duplicator and then stapling
all together, has become an increasingly onerous task. If staff time is
honestly calculated, as well as materials, the cost is frighteningly high.
It was decided to investigate alternative methods. The resultant printed
format with paste-ups and typing done by the Museum is in fact marginally
cheaper than the duplicated version and saves a great deal of office time.
Also, we hope, it gives a higher standard of work. We trust that you
appreciate this improvement. |
Help!
Practical Volunteers
The need for this
class of volunteer is once again growing. During the past year many tasks
have been undertaken by groups and individuals, some coming to stay near
the Museum as a holiday. Their contribution is much appreciated.
However, so that we
can expand this help and organise with greater efficiency, the Director
is seeking a voluntary organiser, who can help with the supervision of
helpers on site. Most weekends the Director is on site but is not always
able to work with groups. The need for someone keen and reasonably fit who
can take charge of groups some times during the weekends is very
essential.
If more than one
willing Friend comes forward for this task, so much the better.
ANYONE INTERESTED
PLEASE MAKE CONTACT.
|
Tenth Birthday
In the last Newsletter, Friends will have read the note about the Tenth
Birthday of the Museum. It would have been pleasant if possible to have held
a major celebration. However, members will, I am sure, agree that we should
not use our efforts and funds for celebrations but rather to continue the
development of the Museum.
A
small celebration will, however, be arranged to take place after the
Friends' Annual General Meeting.
In early August, a small party was held at the Museum for the Council of
Management, to which a number of people who have helped the Museum in
special ways were invited, particularly those who have helped financially.
The function was also intended as a promotional event. Those of you who
read the local press releases after will have realised that the results
were very satisfactory.
However, it should once again be said that without the voluntary help the
Museum has been so freely given over the past years, nothing would have
been possible. We hope that many of you will be with the organization at our
"Silver Jubilee".
The August party was an opportunity to make a small presentation to Roy
Armstrong in recognition of his most important contribution to the Museum.
This was in appreciation of his determined and far-sighted work for the
establishment of the Museum. The results of his work can be seen by all. |
Events 1977
During the summer a number of events took place at the Museum. Some of them
are listed below.
 |
Morris dancing by
the Broadwood Men. |
 |
Singleton Silver
Jubilee Party. |
 |
Day Course: West
Sussex County Planning Department. |
 |
Guild of Sussex
Craftsmen. Demonstration of Hurdle making. |
 |
Pottery firing. |
 |
Play Reading: New
Ventures and Midhurst Grammar School |
 |
Voluntary work:
H.M.S. Daedelus. Royal Navy. |
 |
Friends' Summer
Party |
 |
10th Birthday
Celebration Evening Seminars. |
Increasingly, it becomes possible to extend the use of the Museum. The more
events and activities we can host or encourage the more life will be given
to the Museum. If readers have any ideas and can help with organisation,
please let the Museum know.
|
Safety
Increasingly, we have to pay attention to safety on the site. Stewards can
help us by picking up cans and any dangerous items that tend to lie around,
or by reporting to the Warden dangerous situations that occur.
Volunteers involved in physical work are asked to be sensible and careful
with tools and, particularly, with mechanical equipment. The use of tractors
on the site is only possible with the permission of the Director, or Miss H.
Jackson. |
Thank You
On behalf of the Council of Management, may I express thanks to all the
Stewards who have made the season possible by their continued contribution.
Your help is essential. Many thanks. There are also a number of people who
have made special contributions. However, it would be invidious to make any
special mention of individuals but to these people we are especially
grateful.
I
trust for those of you who are not involved with us during the winter that
the rest from the Museum will give you new enthusiasm for next year: We look
forward to seeing you then.
The Museum is open during the winter on Sundays from 11.00 a.m. to 4.00 pm.
It will also be open on Bank Holidays following Christmas and the New Year.
The main season starts on Good Friday. |
Major Grants and Sponsorship Recently Received.
|
Donor |
Purpose |
|
Monument Trust
|
Lavant and three
year sponsorship of three craftsmen. |
|
King George V
Jubilee Trust |
Education |
|
Victoria and
Albert Museum |
Waters field
Stable |
|
Pilgrim Trust |
Crawley Hall |
|
Gosport &
Fareham Conservative Association |
Court Barn |
|
Kleinwort Trust |
Crawley Hall |
|
Worshipful
Company of Carpenters |
General Fund |
|
Idlewild Trust |
Boarhunt and
general |
|
Peter Minet
Trust |
Electrical
services. |
The Museum is extremely grateful for the support and also for the help
received from many individuals.
We are entirely dependent on support for the continuance of our development
programme and future financial help is still sought. |
Summer School
A
new venture was held at the Museum this summer holiday in the form of a
'Summer School'. Despite the bad weather on one or two afternoons the
sessions were well attended by children between the ages of six and
fifteen. A number of topics were available for the children to pursue,
including smithying, drawing , painting and traditional cooking. |
Winter Use
Between November 1977 and March 1978 inclusive, on Wednesdays and Thursdays,
the Museum will be offering a limited opening to schools wishing to visit
the Museum. All schools wishing to use this facility must book.
We are now able to offer the Goodwood Granary as an educational room for
children involved in specialized project work. This could prove useful as a
base for children wishing to do detailed drawings or measuring of
buildings etc.
Alternatively, slides and visual aids dealing with relevant information
could be shown.
|
|
Salvington Mill |
|

The formation of a Trust to take responsibility for the restoration of the
Mill at Salvington, has now taken place. Representatives from Worthing
Borough Council, The Friends of the Salvington Mill and the Museum, came
together for this project. The Worthing Council have given the project very
exceptional support and have allocated £5000 to the Trust towards the cost
of restoration. Fund raising is now in progress and it is hoped that work
will start in earnest early next year.
Salvington Mill is the last survivor of several mills, which once supplied
the needs of the Worthing area. It is very complete but the condition of
some parts of the structure are poor.
It is a post mill, with a later and altered roundhouse. It formerly worked
with two pairs of stones (a head and tail layout) driven by four common
sails which have now been removed.
The aim is that not only will the Mill be restored to working order, but
that also a small interpretation complex should be established close by the
Mill. This would deal with the history of milling and related agricultural
practice in the Worthing area. Co-operation between the bodies involved,
also the Worthing Museum, should result in the establishment of an
interesting site museum.
The "Friends of Salvington Mill" is the fund raising and supporting
organisation. Anyone who is interested in helping this venture should
contact: Brian Mcluskie, Esq., 17, Wentworth
Close, Worthing, Sussex.
|
|
Feature
- THE ROYAL COMMISSION ON HISTORICAL MONUMENTS (ENGLAND) |
|
|
R.W.
McDowall CBE MA FSA
Robin McDowall, who has been associated with the Museum since its inception,
joined the staff of the Commission as an investigator in 1936. As Secretary,
he is now the senior member of the permanent staff. The opinions expressed
are his own personal views and not necessarily those of the Commissioners.
The usual function of a Royal Commission is to provide the Government with
information of a professional or technical nature. The Royal Commissions on
Ancient and Historical Monuments were first appointed in 1908 by a
government that was faced with threats of destruction of historic buildings
but had no information on which to base a policy of preservation. Three
Commissions were appointed, for England, Scotland and Wales, to make
inventories of monuments and to recommend those especially worthy of
preservation. Monuments included all constructions illustrative of the
contemporary life and culture of the people. The remarks that follow relate
to the English Commission only.
It was originally envisaged that the production of a complete Inventory with
accompanying recommendations would be a fairly speedy process which might
take perhaps twenty years. But the Commission's policy of historical
analysis and description would have made this impossible even if the
original terminal date of 1700 had been adhered to. In the event the listing
of historic buildings for immediate planning control was undertaken after
the 1939-45 war by the Ministry of Town and Country Planning, later Housing
and Local Government and now the Department of the Environment. But the
climate of public opinion which has made 'listing' acceptable to the general
public and much of the expertise of those who compile the 'lists' have
largely grown out of the researches of the Commission.
The Commissioners, normally fifteen in number, are eminent historians and
archaeologists, many of them professors, and are appointed by Royal Warrant.
They direct the work of a permanent staff who are paid out of government
funds, but are not civil servants. They include investigators, photographers
and illustrators, with clerical support. The Commission is quite independent
of the Directorate of Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings of the
Department of the Environment.
The Commission is best known by its published county inventories which now
cover field monuments and buildings from the earliest prehistoric times up
to 1850, but it also has other responsibilities beside the preparation and
publication of these inventories. The county surveys themselves are
accompanied by recommendations for preservation and these recommendations
are of considerable assistance to the Ancient Monuments Inspectorate of the
Department of the Environment, especially in the preparation of lists of
field monuments for scheduling. On occasions the Commission's survey work
brings to light buildings of a major importance which might otherwise have
been mutilated or destroyed in spite of the 'listing' procedure, which is
necessarily of a more perfunctory character. An outstanding example is the
13th century Old Deanery at Salisbury, which was only recognised for what it
was after careful examination by the Commission.
Apart from such more spectacular discoveries the Commission's inventories
provide a much fuller and more detailed analysis of the monuments recorded
than the D.G.E. lists, which are generally based on superficial appearance
alone, and, of course, they cover monuments of all sorts.
Since 1953 the Commission has accepted responsibility
for the recording of monuments at risk; this includes field monuments in
danger from quarrying, mining and afforestation as well as new methods of
agriculture, and buildings. Responsibility for recording 'listed' buildings
has since been acknowledged in the Town and Country Planning Acts so that
'listed building consent' is conditional upon facilities being given to the
Commission to record.
The detailed examination of buildings at risk has on occasion led to
unexpected finds and to the preservation of important remains. This work
also led to the development of detailed studies of the timber-framed
buildings of the southern Pennines and to the fortified farmhouses of the
Scottish border. Neither of those groups of buildings had previously
received the attention they deserved.
The first ten years of this work was reviewed in Monuments Threatened or
Destroyed (1963) which called public attention to the extent of the
buildings at risk and provided the evidence that enabled Duncan Sandys to
succeed in the establishment of Conservation Areas.
This recording of buildings at risk over the whole of England gave the
opportunity for an appreciation of the variety of vernacular buildings over
a wider area than had ever before been attempted. The author's own work in
this field was taken over by Eric Mercer, whose assessment of the historical
problems raised was published as English Vernacular Houses (1976) which
emphasises the Commission's interest in relating the buildings recorded to
the wider field of social history.
On the prehistoric side the Commission also published an earlier review of
the prehistoric sites threatened by gravel digging, A Matter of Time (1960).
This book highlighted the enormous number of archaeological sites which the
growing use of aerial photography was bringing to light. It recognised that
the surviving evidence of prehistory was far greater than the Commission
could ever hope to record in detail or to explain without excavation, and
called attention to some of the particular areas where intensive
archaeological work by locally based research was needed. The lessons of A
Matter of Time were appreciated in some areas but it was a decade before
they were given national expression with the establishment of Rescue.
Before the last war and in the early years that followed the Commission were
almost alone in the analysis and recording of historic buildings and ancient
structures. Archaeologists were concerned with excavation and the
classification of their finds. The Ministry of Works was concerned with the
physical preservation of monuments in its care and its historical researches
were limited to elucidation of those monuments. During the last
twenty-five years the whole scene has changed.
On the buildings side there has been an enormous growth of public interest
in the smaller traditional buildings, so that not only is there a
flourishing national Vernacular Architecture Group, but there are numerous
local groups concerned with the study of the buildings in their localities,
including those in Surrey and Sussex, which maintain a close liaison with
our museum. The existence of the museum at Singleton itself, and the public
interest it attracts, bear witness to the new public consciousness of our
architectural heritage.
On the archaeological side recent years have seen the appointment of
archaeology officers by many local authorities, either as part of their
museums service or attached to the planning department, and the
establishment of district county or regional archaeological units (many with
financial backing from the D.O.E.) in almost every part of the country. Some
Archaeology officers may be primarily concerned to give planning advice to
their Councils, and local units may be primarily concerned with excavation,
but all these officers and organisations require to know the extent of which
historic monuments survive in their areas. A recent enquiry has shown that
there are now only two counties in which some effort to produce a full list
of sites and monuments is not making some progress.
English Vernacular Houses showed that there is more to the study of houses
than identifying and dating surviving examples. Archaeology too has moved
beyond the identification of individual constructions and the classification
of finds. Archaeology today seeks to relate the surviving evidences of
manmade structures not only to each other but to the whole manmade
landscape in which they are set. And it has become clear that man's
influence on the landscape of this country is not confined to the historical
period. The individual sites identified and described in local 'sites and
monuments records' need to be analysed in depth and combined into a wide
archaeological or historical picture.
This is going to call for the closest possible cooperation between the
Commission and every local unit or group.
For years it has been the subject of wry jokes that the Royal Commission
could not complete its tasks before most of the monuments to be recorded had
ceased to exist, but with the support and co-operation of local enterprise
this need not now be true. The Commission has begun to build links with
local authorities which should lead to joint inventory productions. County
councils have given support to the work of the Victoria County Histories; if
they will now give support to the Commission there can be real hope for
satisfactory progress towards the fulfilment of the Commission's task.
The Council for British Archaeology recently produced a document calling for
drastic restructuring of the whole of public service archaeology; this, it
seems, is not likely to bear fruit. What is more pertinent to the immediate
way forward is the latest paper issued from the Ancient Monuments
Inspectorate, Rescue Archaeology: The Next Phase, which was the subject of a
recent article in "The Times".
D.O.E. thinking about 'rescue' is aimed mainly at buried sites but all that
they say is equally applicable to buildings, and most local officers and
organisations are well aware of this. The objectives enumerated by the D.O.E.
include the establishment of a sites and monuments record in each county,
and the conduct of thematic surveys. The 'rescue' money available to the
D.O.E. is primarily intended for archaeological excavation, for 'digging up
the past'. This leaves out sites and monuments records, thematic surveys and
the controlled analytical demolition of buildings
such as redundant churches. At the same time it seems possible that the
Ordnance Survey may withdraw from the indexing of archaeological sites which
are not to be shown in published maps and that this task may have to be
undertaken by the Commission. If this should occur the maintenance of the
national index now the responsibility of the O.S. would devolve on the
Archaeological Section of the National Monuments Record.
The National Monuments Record has grown out of the National Buildings Record
which was started in 1941 as a collection of architectural photographs and
drawings. After working very closely with the Commission for many years, the
running of the Record was placed in the hands of the Commission in 1963, and
it was enlarged to include archaeological records and aerial photographs of
archaeological sites. The library of architectural photographs is
continually being expanded by the addition of photographs specially taken by
the Commission's own staff, especially photographs of buildings at risk, as
well as photographs donated or purchased from outside sources; it holds many
collections of negatives of distinguished architectural photographers of the
past. It supports the administrative functions of the D.O.E. and its
advisory committees by supplying photographs of buildings whose future is
under consideration and the library is also used by every other sort of
person and organisation wanting photographs of historic buildings.
The Record's collection of air photographs is growing rapidly. Many
photographs are taken by the Commission's own staff; others are supplied by
private fliers. The section provides not only a repository for photographs
but also a unit for the interpretation of air photographs and the
transcription of archaeological information onto maps. This side of the work
is still in its infancy but experiments with the use of a computer for
transcription, now being carried out in Cambridge, hold out hopes for its
more speedy development.
The last ten years has seen an enormous amount of enthusiasm devoted to an
enormous number of diverse projects to study and record the buildings and
the field monuments of this country, some professional, some amateur, some
excellent, some of more doubtful value. It is to be hoped that the next ten
years will see the development of closer co-operation between all the
various aspects of archaeological and architectural survey and the Royal
Commission, so that together they can go forward towards the fuller
understanding of our heritage which is necessary for the development of
proper policies of conservation and preservation as well as for future
archaeological research. The contribution made by the Weald and Downland
Open Air Museum to the study and appreciation of historic buildings is
especially welcomed.
|
|
Pottery Project |
|
The Museum's Pottery
Research project is under way again after an absence of some two years
while the scheme was re-sited in the woods above Winkhurst House.
Under the direction
of Worthing archaeologist, Con Ainsworth the first kiln firing of the new
project took place at the end of August and valuable information was
gained.
The main aim of the
pottery project is to discover more about the craft of pot manufacture in
medieval times, with the aid of a re-constructed kiln based on local
archaeological evidence.
The small group of
pottery volunteers are based now in the Coldwaltham Sheds, re-erected by
another Worthing volunteer Mike Coviello, and his team. Here Robin Cooksey
has been using a kickwheel to throw pots based closely on evidence of
medieval pottery.
The kiln built in
the new pottery area is a reconstruction based on an excavated kiln at
Binsted, near Arundel, West Sussex. A third of the size of the original
kiln, it is a twin flue, updraft type built chiefly
with clay from Clapham, West Sussex.
The kiln at Binsted
was in operation in the first quarter of the fourteenth century - a date
arrived at both by documentary and scientific evidence.
The Binsted kiln was
large and tells us something of the demand for pots in medieval times.
The original had space for firing 800-900 pots and would have been used
over and over again many times. Con Ainsworth has now constructed an
entrance to the kiln based on evidence which would have enabled the
medieval potter to load and unload his kiln without disturbing the kiln
structure.
Pots fired in the
kiln are to be based on pottery found during the course of excavating the
Binsted kiln. The
principal pot discovered was "West Sussex” ware; pots glazed with lead
and copper. Evidence was also found for cooking pots of various types and
specialised roof furniture, such as chimney pots and
finials.
The kiln
reconstructed at the Museum will take about 600-700 pots, but for the
first firing only 150 pots were made.
Con Ainsworth and
his team began firing the kiln at 2 pm on a Saturday and by 4.30 am the
next morning the necessary high temperature of 1000oC had been
reached. The pots were cooked! After leaving
sufficient time for the kiln to cool, it was opened at about 6 pm on the
Sunday evening and the pots extracted.
The success rate of
the pots at this first firing was not as high as at previous firings in
the original project. The answer to the problem lies in the composition of
the clay used for the pots, particularly the quantities of sand added to
the clay.
More pots will be
thrown in preparation for the next firing. The next stage in this project
will be to construct another kiln: very small and not based on any
particular archaeological evidence so as to enable firings of about a
dozen pots.
In the long term the
aim of the pottery group is to reconstruct a rectangular tile kiln based
on archaeological evidence from the one at Binsted.
|
|
Financial
Summary |
Summary of financial
situation for period ended 31st March 1977. It must be noted that this
statement is not an audited account, but is intended as a simple
statement of the Museum's finances. Members may inspect the full accounts
at the Museum office should they wish to do so.
The period is for 15
months due to a change in the accounting date. This change has been made
in order to bring the accounting date into line with our main earning
period.
|
Income |
|
|
Specific Grants
and Donations |
8396.00 |
|
General Grants
and Donations |
1518.00 |
|
Sale of
Publications etc. |
35145.00 |
|
Admissions ...
|
49824.00 |
|
Misc.including
interest |
7691.00 |
|
Surplus brought
forward |
40907.00 |
|
TOTAL
|
143481.00
|
|
Expenditure
|
|
|
Exhibits,
exhibition re-erection of buildings including craftsmens' salaries |
27190.00
Note 1
|
|
Administrative
costs, including salaries. |
20781. 00 |
|
Rent, rates,
insurance |
2507.00 |
|
Publicity |
3064.00 |
|
Purchases for
resale. |
29133.00 |
|
Equipment,
vehicles etc |
6340.00 |
|
Site facilities,
tarmac, new water supply etc. |
14006.00 |
|
Repairs to
buildings |
4986.00 |
|
V.A.T.
|
7095.00
|
|
Miscellaneous |
4360.00
|
|
TOTAL
|
119462.00
|
|
Surplus for
period |
24019.00
Note 2
|
Note 1. Purchases for resale include the purchases of stock for the start of
the 1977 season. The profitability of the shop is approximately 48%, a
slight drop from previous years when we enjoyed a 52% profit margin.
As can be seen from the list of buildings to which we are committed, the
need for continued fund raising is still with us. As before, may we ask
Friends to consider making suggestions for sources of funds and, should they
have good contacts, these would be extremely useful to know of.
A
number of people have recently made provision in their wills for the Museum
to benefit from a legacy. This development is especially encouraging as it
is so very essential to prepare for the future financial stability of the
Museum
Note 2. This surplus is not of course a surplus in the usual sense. A
considerable proportion of the figure is made up by grants and donations
given for a building that has not yet been completed. Other amounts provide
for projects not yet in the Museum's programme. The Museum needs to plan for
an operating surplus and should not be working so near the margin that it
would be unable to cope with an unforeseen situation. This policy has been
illustrated by the bad weather and so therefore smaller receipts this year.
It has been usual to expect the April receipts to provide a surplus over
expenditure but this year the start of the season was so bad that this was
not achieved.
The surplus from the previous year enabled expenses and salaries to be met
without worry.
|
|
Association of Independent Museums |
|
In the last twenty years, numerous new museums have grown up in Britain,
many of them outside the established framework of national and local
government organisations. These new independent museums, usually set up as
charitable trusts, and many of them embracing new concepts, represent a
substantial proportion of the effective growth of museums and are making a
growing contribution to museum thinking. Almost all are characterised by
voluntary support and participation and whilst many have been financed
entirely from within the private sector, others have combined private and
public funds to realise objectives which for various reasons are not being
achieved by the appropriate public bodies.
At a meeting of the directors of several independent museums, held in
autumn 1976, it was decided to set up an Association of Independent Museums
to represent their interests at national and regional level and to provide a
voice in the current debate on the future of museums in Britain. An interim
statement has already been sent to the Standing Commission on Museums and
Galleries.
In June 1977, a meeting was held at the Gladstone Pottery Museum, which was
attended by a large number of representatives from independent museums. The
meeting was addressed by Lord Donaldson, Minister for the Arts.
Neil Cossons, Director of the Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust, reviewed the
track record of independent museums, He pointed out that independent museums
represent one of the major growth areas in British museum development in the
last ten years.
The meeting agreed that A.I.M. should be established and a Steering
Committee be formed to report back with a draft constitution, listing
objectives and the financial structure of such an organisation.
The Steering Committee is now established and will report in the near
future.
|
|
FRIENDS OF THE
MUSEUM |
Looking Backwards - Looking Forwards
John Lowe.
The Museum is celebrating its 10th Anniversary this year. The Friends of the
Open Air Museum cannot yet claim to be so venerable, although we are not so
far behind. On 6th November, 1969, I wrote to the Department of Education &
Science requesting charitable status for the Friends and on 29th August,
1970 (the D.E.S. take a long time to answer letters!), the Inaugural Meeting
was held in the West Dean Village Hall.
Much has happened since then. A year later, we had seven hundred members and
had raised £6,444. Over the next year or two the membership rose to over a
thousand and the Friends were able to give money to many important projects
at the Museum. The summer parties became an institution, a large number of
the Friends gave invaluable volunteer service at the Museum, and the Friends
became an integrated and vital part of the Museum's organisation making a
major contribution to its remarkably rapid success. Material support is
always valuable, but so is moral support, and the continuing interest and
enthusiasm of the Friends has been a great encouragement to the staff.
The time has now come for me to retire, partly because of other demands on
my time, but more so because I strongly believe in change and
new ideas.
I
have had great pleasure from running the Friends and am deeply grateful for
all the support and friendship I have received, both as Director and since.
I could not be more delighted that Bernard Johnson is taking over. It is
time for developments, for more events for recruiting more members and he
will do all of this.
I
would ask you to help him in two particular ways.
Please try to recruit some new members. Please, if you can afford it, give a
little (or a lot) more than your basic subscription. The Museum has a large
number of buildings; all of importance, waiting for re-erection and every
penny you give to the Friends goes to the Museum - primarily to buildings.
The Annual General Meeting at County Hall on Saturday, 3rd December, will be
my swan song and I hope I may be able to entertain you with an illustrated
talk on The History of Tea Drinking Around the World, another of my studies
on the relationship between social history and the arts, starting with the
mythical first tea drinking Emperor of China, and following through this
"sweet herb" to the concealed gin of Mrs. Gamp's teapot!
Thank you again for all your support and encouragement. The Friends have
been very important to me and very important to the Weald and Downland Open
Air Museum which, like the Friends, will go from strength to strength.
The New Honorary
Secretary
Mr. Bernard Johnson has kindly agreed to become Honorary Secretary of the
Friends when Mr. John Lowe resigns at the Annual General Meeting on 3rd
December, 1977. Mr. Johnson will be known to many of the Friends for, his
many years work as a volunteer at the Museum, as an enthusiastic member of
the Friends' Committee and as the excellent organiser of the successful
excursion to Bokrijk last May. In the view of the retiring Honorary
Secretary and the Friends' Committee, the Friends could not be passing into
more capable hands.
From 3rd December, please will members address all enquiries to the
Honorary Secretary to Bernard Johnson, c/o The Museum.
A Tour for 1978
Home or Abroad?
It is hoped to organise a long weekend excursion for members in 1978. Would,
you be more interested in a home tour of open air museums in this country OR
another short tour to Europe?
What time of year would suit you best? Have you any special suggestions? If
you would like to join a tour, please write at once to Bernard Johnson (c/o
the Museum) answering the questions above.
The British
Association of Friends of Museums
The Open Air Museum is now a member of this organisation which organises a
number of interesting events each year and aims to stimulate interest in
Friends of Museums and Art Galleries throughout the country. It is also
affiliated to the World Federation of Friends of Museums, which in turn
mounts international conferences each year. Our membership entitles any
Friend to take part in the British Association's activities. In future their
notices and publications will be shown on the notice board at the Open Air
Museum.
Free Entry for
Guests
Considerable confusion has arisen in the last year or two about who is
allowed to bring their guests, free of charge, to the Museum during the open
season.
The following rules have been agreed by the Friends' Committee. The
Committee know that you will appreciate that the survival and development
of the Museum depends on entrance fees and it is not, therefore, in the
best interests of the Museum to spread this privilege too wide.
a. Life Member: One free guest.
b. Ordinary Member: No free guests.
c. Family Member: Includes husband, wife and children.
d. Volunteer/Volunteer Steward: Immediate family and one free guest.
Accounts
Friends of the Weald and Downland Open
Air Museum
Registered as a Charity with the Department of Education and Science
No.L243587/3
INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT
for the year ended 31st March 1977
|
INCOME
|
|
1977
|
|
1976
|
|
Life Membership
Subscriptions |
|
710
|
)
|
|
|
Subscriptions and
Donations |
|
2,303
|
) |
2,951
|
|
Social Account |
|
50 |
) |
|
|
Buffet |
|
101 |
|
10 |
|
Income Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable from
Covenanted Income |
|
351
|
|
365
|
|
Transitional
Relief F.A. 1973 s.52
|
|
35 |
|
24
|
|
Building Society
Interest Relief
|
|
41 |
|
36 |
|
Bank Deposit
Interest |
|
239 |
|
159 |
|
Building Society
Interest |
|
77
|
|
68
|
|
Interest on
Investments |
|
53
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
3,960 |
|
3163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LESS EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postage, Printing,
Stationery &Telephone |
103 |
|
|
117
|
|
J.H. Hill -
Treasurer's Fee |
|
|
33
|
|
|
Travelling
Expenses
|
12
|
|
10 |
|
|
Audit Fee |
54
|
|
45
|
|
|
Lecture Fee and
Expenses |
26 |
195 |
|
205 |
|
|
|
3,765
|
|
3,408 |
|
Donations - Weald
and Downland Open Air Museum Limited re: Newsletter
postage
Casual Labour
Flymo
|
85
747
92
|
924 |
|
435 |
|
TOTAL |
|
2,841 |
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET as
at 31st MARCH 1977
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
1977
|
|
1976
|
|
South of England Building
Society
|
1,287
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
£1675.98 Liverpool
Corporation 9¾% Stock 1980/84 |
1,420
|
|
|
|
|
£200 Corporation
of London
13¼% Stock 1983 |
200
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at Bank –
Deposit Account
Current Account
|
4,784
393
|
|
2,515
1,469
|
|
|
Repayment of
Income Tax due |
393 |
|
430 |
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
5,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions
received in Advance |
28 |
|
25 |
|
|
Creditor - Auditor
fee |
54 |
|
45 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
8394 |
|
5554 |
|
|
|
8395 |
|
5554 |
|
Represented by: |
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL FUND |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at 1st
April 1976 |
5554 |
|
2581 |
|
|
Add: Excess of
income over expenditure for the year |
2481 |
|
2973 |
|
|
|
|
8395 |
|
5554 |
|
|
|
8395 |
|
5554 |
We certify that the above accounts are prepared from the books and records
produced to us by the Friends of the Weald and Downland Open Air Museum and
from information supplied and that to the best of our knowledge and belief
they are in accordance therewith.
Dominican House,
St. John’s Street
Chichester, Sussex.
23rd August 1977.
Chartered Accountants.
|
[Magazine Index] [Home]
|